Passion in Education Essay

What came first, the chicken, or the bollock? A question in which many would say the chicken, be reach without the chicken, the egg wouldnt be there. Others expertness say that the egg came first because chickens bob up from eggs, so without the egg, the chicken wouldnt even exist. Its not the fact of which came first in this situation, rather than how they go hand in hand. Both the egg and the chicken involve each other to be complete, just like instructors, and pupils. Teachers need bookmans for directional purposes, and students need schoolers to visit.The idea of can there be education without passion? is a debatable topic especially since some students might say that its the teachers pipeline to make the divide pastimeing and gain their interest. Teachers on the other hand might elicit that its up to the students to c are enough about their education to strike themselves to understand from the curriculum, no matter how tough, or dry the education may be. In t he sense of coming together for a common cause passion is required to learn and succeed in school, but teachers similarly need passion to successfully teach their students.Patrick Sullivan, an English teacher at Manchester Community College in Connecticut, author of A Lifelong Aversion to authorship What If Writing Courses Emphasized Motivation expresses the idea that teachers need to attain the interest of their students and teach them the criteria in trends that the students understand it, and olfactory perception the need to learn it, but he also be reposeves that the students themselves need to develop Intrinsic motivation. Students who are engaged and motivate learn some effort slight(prenominal)ly. Those who are not al or so ever struggle, resist, and often fail.Unmotivated students also often become unquiet and troublesome influences in our classrooms (Sullivan, 120 ). Students who put fore the effort undeniable to succeed in a classroom tend to do punter than those who fatiguet. Without that inner passion to learn what a teacher is teaching, the student wont learn. A teacher could come up with the best, most interactive lesson plan, but if the motivation isnt there for a student, thusly all the teachers efforts are for nothing. Not all the beak can be put on the teachers. Some students just are not unforced to learn, and continue with their education.College classrooms are filled with students who do not prepare for class. many a(prenominal) study less than 10 hours a week thats less than half the hours they spent studying 40 years ago. Paradoxically, students are expense more and more money for an education that seems to deliver less and less content (Stuart Rojstaczer). Most students in college dont put forth the effort needed to fully captivate everything a college class is self-aggrandizing, and its not because the education isnt there, but that the students are not motivated to learn because they see that with little effort, they c an pass their classes, and dont need to study their brains out.The blame cant only lie with the students either. Without teachers being passionate about teaching, then students wont embrace the concept of what is being taught to them. It is essential that English teachers begin to engage this look carefully and begin developing curriculum designed specifically to press and nurture motivation (Sullivan, 120). Without intrinsic motivation students wont learn well, but it lies on the teachers as well to motivate students to desire to learn, and to indispensableness to pursue their education.Students need to see where motivation can get them, for them to want to motivate themselves. Education is not the filling of a bucket, but the lighting of a fire. The presence or absence of this fire, of course, affects everything students experience in classrooms (Sullivan, 120). If teachers dont make the class interesting and engage the students, then they wont feel the need to motivate them selves to learn what is being taught. How they feel about the class effects how they learn. If they dislike a certain subject, theyll always approach the subject with a bad mentality, and with that mentality, it ordain affect how they learn.In the attempt to attract students teachers convey loosened up. They grade much more light than their colleagues in science. In English. they dont give many Ds or Cs for that matter (Edmundson). Students wont learn any better If teachers make the class easier, and in no way is that way of teaching ethical. Students wont try harder, or be more interested in the class. They will simply slake off even more and take the class as a joke. Teachers need to find a balance amidst making the class understandable, yet understanding.Dumbing it down, and passing students who dont deserve the grade will make the class pointless and nothing will come from it. I have yet to find a teacher who teaches just to teach. They all want to make an impact on their students lives, and dumbing down courses wont help anyone. Neither the teachers nor the students are to blame for lack of passion in education. They both have to do their job as either a teacher who teaches English, or a student who is in an English class. The teacher has to engage the students to want to learn, and the student has to have motivation to want to learn what the teacher is teaching.If either of the jobs is lacking, then the likelihood of a student or teachers success is lower than if both were giving it their all. They both go hand in hand, and one wouldnt be complete without the other just like the chicken and the egg. A teacher doesnt teach an empty classroom now do they? They teach students for a reason, so that the students learn, but if the students are just sitting in the classroom, not paying attention or do not come prepared, then they might as well teach to thin air, because no one is benefiting from what the teacher has to offer.