Separation Or Cooperation :: essays research papers fc

Separation or CooperationOne ever feels his twoness, -an American, a blackness two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings two warring ideas in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being tear asunder.-W.E.B. Du BoisThe resoluteness of Indep conclusionence and the Declaration of cutting Churchmen both held out the bully promise of rectifying injustices in America. The Declaration of Independence came in response to the one-man rule of English rule. It trumpeted the lofty goals of equality for all men, an end to English rule, and the end to high taxes on colonists. The Declaration of Black Churchmen was drafted in response to the proceed low socio-economic status of African Americans after the demise of the Civil Rights safari in the late nineteen-sixties. It has as its goals integration, an end to the exploitative control of African Americans, and the more amorphous goal of an end to the institutional violence of clean-living America. Even though both declarations sought an end to a particular proposition kind of injustice, one failed and the other succeeded in bringing about its goals. My thesis is that the Black Churchmens Declaration of Independence struggles to both setup an us-them and a we modus operandi. The Black Churchmens declaration tries to cooperate with White America in order to take support for economic development in Black communities. The declaration likewise tries to vilify White America as a demonic line that for hundreds of years has destroyed the hopes of Black Americans. By oscillating between these icy modes of thought the documents rhetorical power and tone changes significantly from the original Declaration of Independence. The fundamental structure of the original Declaration of Independence relies on an us-them dichotomy. England is classified advertisement as the them, and the colonists as the us. The grievances listed in the document create a unclutter delineation between colonists and col onized. The grievances also place blame squarely on England. They site the taxation policy, the lack of self government, the tyranny of England, and the abuse of the colonists "The recital of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations" (Jefferson 1) to unloosen their right to succeed. As the list of grievances goes on the us-them dichotomy becomes more say until the document explicitly delineates as "us" and a "them", "They too stir been deaf too the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce" (Jefferson 3).